 |
|||||||
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|||||||
|
The unusual shape of the rear tower was the result of placing two twin 5” aa mounts at an elevation of 53.5’ (16.3m) above the waterline. Massive supports were neccessary, forcing designers to adopt an unconventional tower layout. |
|||||||
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
The unusual shape of the rear tower was the result of placing two twin 5” aa mounts at an elevation of 53.5’ (16.3m) above the waterline. Massive supports were neccessary, forcing designers to adopt an unconventional tower layout. |
|||||||